
This lesson requires Loopus Pro access. Upgrade to unlock all courses, labs, and challenges.
Deployed SOAR requires ongoing optimization to maximize value. Measuring effectiveness, identifying improvement opportunities, and scaling automation extends SOAR benefits.
Time savings - How much analyst time does automation save? Compare time before and after automation for common tasks.
Mean time to respond (MTTR) - How quickly do incidents reach resolution? Automation should reduce response time.
Alert handling capacity - How many alerts can the team handle? Automation should increase throughput without adding staff.
Accuracy - Are automated actions correct? Track false positive rates in automated decisions.
Coverage - What percentage of alerts have playbooks? Gaps represent automation opportunities.
Analyze failures. Why do playbooks fail? Integration issues, edge cases, or design flaws? Each failure reveals improvement opportunities.
Track manual steps. When analysts intervene in otherwise automated workflows, that represents automation potential.
Measure bottlenecks. Where do alerts queue waiting for human action? Can those gates be widened or automated?
Review false positives. High false positive rates might indicate detection tuning needs rather than more automation.
Playbook libraries. Build reusable playbook components. Common enrichment steps can serve many workflows.
Templates and standards. Consistent playbook structure eases maintenance and onboarding.
Tier appropriate automation. Simple, high-volume alerts get more automation. Complex incidents get more human involvement.
Continuous improvement. Each incident creates learning. Did the playbook work? What would make it better? Regular reviews drive improvement.
Automation handles:
Effective SOAR enables:
What automation use cases provide value?
What term describes a boring task?
How do you measure automation success?
What metric compares cost/benefit?